- See John Hickenlooper's sponsored bills →John HickenlooperDemocraticIncumbent✓ Verified$9.3M raised
- Mark BaisleyRepublican✓ Verified$138K raised
- Bob ChewOTHER✓ Verified$2.9M raised
- Adam WithrowUnity Party✓ Verified
- Blake HuberLibertarian✓ Verified
- Christopher BaumApproval Voting Party✓ Verified
Where they stand
Sources under every entry. Sentences are AI-written from the linked source.
Where they differ: John Hickenlooper supports investing in affordable housing, infrastructure, clean energy, and workers' rights, and votes against disapproving financial regulations 123. Mark Baisley supports cutting federal taxes, rolling back regulations, and restoring American energy dominance, and backs legal immigration vetted for non-violence and assimilation 410. Bob Chew prioritizes fiscal responsibility with entitlement reform and national debt reduction, proposing spending restraint and tax reforms to broaden the base 516. Adam Withrow advocates for healthcare for all at less than half the defense budget and supports transitioning to clean, affordable energy while opposing military adventurism 72326.
AI-written comparison of the sourced entries below. Generated Oct 19, 2026.
| Issue | John HickenlooperDemocratic | Mark BaisleyRepublican | Bob ChewOTHER | Adam WithrowUnity Party | Blake HuberLibertarian | Christopher BaumApproval Voting Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economy & Jobs | Hickenlooper supports building an economy that works for everyone by investing in affordable housing, infrastructure, clean energy, and protecting small businesses and workers. Hickenlooper supports unions and legislation to protect workers’ rights, fair wages, and better working conditions. Hickenlooper votes nay on resolutions disapproving financial regulations from the Treasury and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. | Baisley supports cutting federal taxes, rolling back regulations, and restoring American energy dominance to boost business growth and job creation. | Chew supports comprehensive fiscal responsibility, including entitlement reform and national debt reduction, to restore economic stability and opportunity for all generations. | No public position found. Check their site ↗ | No public position found. | No public position found. |
| Healthcare | Hickenlooper supports affordable, high-quality, universal health care as a right for all Americans and opposes policies that cut Medicaid and ACA funding. | No public position found. Check their site ↗ | No public position found. Check their site ↗ | Withrow supports reimagining the healthcare system to work for everyone and advocates for healthcare for all at a cost less than half the defense budget. | No public position found. | No public position found. |
| Where they differ on Healthcare: John Hickenlooper supports affordable, high-quality, universal health care as a right for all Americans and opposes policies that cut Medicaid and ACA funding 1. Adam Withrow supports reimagining the healthcare system to work for everyone and advocates for healthcare for all at a cost less than half the defense budget 2. | ||||||
| Immigration | Hickenlooper supports humane immigration reform that restores decency, maintains a secure border, and expands lawful pathways to citizenship. Hickenlooper votes nay on the Laken Riley Act immigration bill. | Baisley supports legal immigration that is vetted for non-violence, self-reliance, and assimilation, while encouraging others to establish natural law in their home countries. | No public position found. Check their site ↗ | No public position found. Check their site ↗ | No public position found. | No public position found. |
| Where they differ on Immigration: John Hickenlooper supports humane immigration reform that restores decency, maintains a secure border, and expands lawful pathways to citizenship 1. He voted nay on the Laken Riley Act immigration bill 2. Mark Baisley supports legal immigration that is vetted for non-violence, self-reliance, and assimilation, while encouraging others to establish natural law in their home countries 3. | ||||||
| Public Safety & Crime | Hickenlooper votes yea on the HALT Fentanyl Act. | Baisley commits to supporting law enforcement with funding and ending programs that prematurely release violent criminals to ensure community safety. | No public position found. Check their site ↗ | Withrow supports improving veteran care and accountability in the VA system and opposes sending troops to fight other people's wars. | No public position found. | No public position found. |
| Where they differ on Public Safety & Crime: John Hickenlooper voted in favor of the HALT Fentanyl Act, which addresses issues related to fentanyl 1. Mark Baisley has committed to supporting law enforcement through funding and ending programs that prematurely release violent criminals to enhance community safety 2. Adam Withrow supports improving veteran care and accountability in the VA system and opposes sending troops to fight other countries' wars 3. | ||||||
| Abortion | Hickenlooper believes reproductive health decisions should be private and co-sponsors legislation to protect abortion rights. | No public position found. Check their site ↗ | No public position found. Check their site ↗ | No public position found. Check their site ↗ | No public position found. | No public position found. |
| Taxes & Government Spending | Hickenlooper votes yea on appropriations bills and nay on budget resolutions and continuing appropriations acts. | Baisley proposes targeted tax relief for farmers and ranchers to reduce costs on equipment leases and production inputs, promoting profitability without adding government layers. | Chew prioritizes long-term fiscal responsibility by proposing spending restraint, entitlement reforms, tax reforms to broaden the base, and dedicating new revenues to debt reduction. Chew says neither major party will seriously address the national debt, deficit spending, or Social Security insolvency. | Withrow supports tax relief for employers who raise wages and opposes raising taxes without raising workers' ability to pay. | No public position found. | No public position found. |
| Where they differ on Taxes & Government Spending: John Hickenlooper votes yea on appropriations bills and nay on budget resolutions and continuing appropriations acts 1. Mark Baisley proposes targeted tax relief for farmers and ranchers to reduce costs on equipment leases and production inputs, promoting profitability without adding government layers 2. Bob Chew prioritizes long-term fiscal responsibility by proposing spending restraint, entitlement reforms, tax reforms to broaden the base, and dedicating new revenues to debt reduction 3. Chew also says neither major party will seriously address the national debt, deficit spending, or Social Security insolvency 4. | ||||||
| Energy & Environment | Hickenlooper supports fighting climate change by investing in clean energy technology and protecting public lands and scientific research. Hickenlooper views climate change as an existential threat and supports bold, science-based policies to expand clean energy and transition away from fossil fuels. Hickenlooper votes nay on multiple joint resolutions disapproving Bureau of Land Management rules related to land and resource management. | Baisley supports protecting the energy industry and restoring American energy dominance as part of economic growth and prosperity. | No public position found. Check their site ↗ | Withrow supports transitioning to clean, affordable energy and ending net-metering offset caps to democratize power generation. | No public position found. | No public position found. |
| Foreign Policy & Defense | Hickenlooper votes yea on resolutions to remove U.S. forces from Iran, on terminating national emergencies imposing tariffs, and on the SEED Act. | No public position found. Check their site ↗ | Chew emphasizes the importance of addressing international threats to peace and prosperity as part of his campaign issues. | Withrow opposes military adventurism, supports reasserting Congressional war powers, and wants the military to focus solely on defense. | No public position found. | No public position found. |
| Where they differ on Foreign Policy & Defense: John Hickenlooper votes yea on resolutions to remove U.S. forces from Iran, on terminating national emergencies imposing tariffs, and on the SEED Act 1. Bob Chew emphasizes the importance of addressing international threats to peace and prosperity as part of his campaign issues 2. Adam Withrow opposes military adventurism, supports reasserting Congressional war powers, and wants the military to focus solely on defense 3. | ||||||