2026 Elections · Arizona

Arizona's 3rd Congressional District Candidates 2026

See every declared 2026 U.S. House candidate running in this Arizona congressional district, with FEC campaign finance and where they stand on the issues.

Source:FECUpdated Oct 19, 2026Report a correction

Who is running in Arizona's 3rd Congressional District in 2026?

Yassamin Ansari (Democratic), Alan Aversa (No Labels Party) and David Redkey (Green).

  • Yassamin AnsariDemocraticIncumbent✓ Verified
    $1.6M raised
    • Official FEC
    • Positions sourced
    See Yassamin Ansari's sponsored bills →
  • Alan AversaNo Labels Party✓ Verified
    • Positions sourced
  • David RedkeyGreen✓ Verified
    • Positions sourced

Where they stand

Sources under every entry. Sentences are AI-written from the linked source.

Where they differ: Yassamin Ansari supports ending trickle-down policies to strengthen the middle class and votes yea on technology and financial protection bills but nay on capital access and privacy in purchases acts 12. She supports secure borders with pro-immigration reform and votes nay on multiple immigration enforcement bills but yea on a national emergency resolution 67. Alan Aversa supports local, sustainable farming and equitable, decentralized capital distribution to address unemployment 3. He opposes expanding federal border enforcement, preferring state-level handling, and opposes abortion, supporting pro-life efforts from conception onward 81213. David Redkey advocates for government focused on the working class rather than wealthy interests 5. He opposes expanding federal border enforcement and increasing federal penalties for drug offenses, citing harm to poor people 911. Redkey supports reproductive rights and opposes restrictions on federal abortion funding 1415.
AI-written comparison of the sourced entries below. Generated Oct 17, 2026.

Where the candidates stand, by issue
IssueYassamin AnsariDemocraticAlan AversaNo Labels PartyDavid RedkeyGreen
Economy & Jobs

Ansari supports an economy that works for everyone by ending trickle-down policies and strengthening the middle class and economic opportunity.

Own words (office website)Source ↗Verified Oct 12, 2026AI-written

Ansari votes yea on technology and financial protection bills but nay on capital access and privacy in purchases acts.

Official recordSource ↗Verified Oct 15, 2026AI-written

Aversa supports local, sustainable farming as a solution to unemployment and advocates for equitable, decentralized distribution of capital rather than centralization.

Candidate's own wordsSource ↗Verified Oct 17, 2026AI-written

Redkey supports Foundation Economics, advocating for high marginal tax rates on ultra-high incomes and concentrated profits, living-wage employer credits, and full childcare subsidies to promote broad prosperity and wag…

Candidate's own wordsSource ↗Verified Oct 17, 2026AI-written

Redkey says government should be built around the needs of the working class rather than the wealthy, corporations, or political insiders.

ReportedSource ↗Verified Oct 8, 2026AI-written

Healthcare

Ansari votes yea on rural care and patient support acts but nay on lowering premiums and Medicaid harm prevention.

Official recordSource ↗Verified Oct 15, 2026AI-written

No public position found. Check their site ↗

No public position found. Check their site ↗

Immigration

Ansari supports secure borders alongside pro-immigration policies and meaningful reform that reflects national values and supports all Arizonans.

Own words (office website)Source ↗Verified Oct 12, 2026AI-written

Ansari votes nay on multiple immigration enforcement and security bills but yea on a national emergency resolution.

Official recordSource ↗Verified Oct 15, 2026AI-written

Aversa opposes expanding federal border-enforcement efforts, saying the issue should be handled at the state level first.

ReportedSource ↗Verified Oct 8, 2026AI-written

Redkey opposes expanding federal border enforcement, saying the issue distracts from economic problems squeezing the working class.

ReportedSource ↗Verified Oct 8, 2026AI-written

Where they differ on Immigration: Yassamin Ansari supports secure borders alongside pro-immigration policies and meaningful reform that reflects national values and supports all Arizonans 1. She votes nay on multiple immigration enforcement and security bills but yea on a national emergency resolution 2. Alan Aversa opposes expanding federal border-enforcement efforts, stating the issue should be handled at the state level first 3. David Redkey opposes expanding federal border enforcement, arguing it distracts from economic problems affecting the working class 4.
Public Safety & Crime

Ansari votes yea on prison staff safety and guard acts but nay on privacy, veterans 2nd amendment, bail, and violent offender bills.

Official recordSource ↗Verified Oct 15, 2026AI-written

No public position found. Check their site ↗

Redkey opposes increasing federal penalties for drug and trafficking offenses, saying such penalties would mainly harm poor people.

ReportedSource ↗Verified Oct 8, 2026AI-written

Where they differ on Public Safety & Crime: Yassamin Ansari votes in favor of prison staff safety and guard acts but against bills related to privacy, veterans' 2nd amendment rights, bail, and violent offenders 1. David Redkey opposes increasing federal penalties for drug and trafficking offenses, arguing that such penalties would mainly harm poor people 2.
Abortion

No public position found. Check their site ↗

Aversa opposes abortion, viewing it as the unjust taking of innocent life, and supports pro-life efforts to end child-killing and protect the right to life for all.

Candidate's own wordsSource ↗Verified Oct 17, 2026AI-written

Aversa opposes abortion, saying he supports defending the right to life from conception onward.

ReportedSource ↗Verified Oct 8, 2026AI-written

Redkey supports reproductive rights, affirming that every woman has the absolute right to decide what happens to her own body free from political or governmental interference.

Candidate's own wordsSource ↗Verified Oct 17, 2026AI-written

Redkey opposes restricting federal funding tied to abortion services, calling such restrictions a way to control women.

ReportedSource ↗Verified Oct 8, 2026AI-written

Where they differ on Abortion: Alan Aversa opposes abortion, viewing it as the unjust taking of innocent life and supports pro-life efforts to end child-killing and protect the right to life for all 1. He also supports defending the right to life from conception onward 2. David Redkey supports reproductive rights, affirming that every woman has the absolute right to decide what happens to her own body free from political or governmental interference 3. He opposes restricting federal funding tied to abortion services, calling such restrictions a way to control women 4.
Taxes & Government Spending

Ansari votes yea on tax relief for fraud victims but nay on budget, appropriations, and continuing appropriations acts.

Official recordSource ↗Verified Oct 15, 2026AI-written

No public position found. Check their site ↗

No public position found. Check their site ↗

Energy & Environment

Ansari votes yea on emissions reduction and conservation acts but nay on EPA rule disapproval and fuel retailer choice bills.

Official recordSource ↗Verified Oct 15, 2026AI-written

No public position found. Check their site ↗

No public position found. Check their site ↗

Foreign Policy & Defense

Ansari votes yea on resolutions to remove US forces from hostilities and veterans clinic naming but nay on defense authorization and FISA extension.

Official recordSource ↗Verified Oct 15, 2026AI-written

Aversa opposes U.S. involvement and funding of wars abroad, emphasizing an America-first approach focused on addressing domestic issues.

Candidate's own wordsSource ↗Verified Oct 17, 2026AI-written

No public position found. Check their site ↗

Where they differ on Foreign Policy & Defense: Yassamin Ansari votes yea on resolutions to remove US forces from hostilities and veterans clinic naming but nay on defense authorization and FISA extension 1. Alan Aversa opposes U.S. involvement and funding of wars abroad, emphasizing an America-first approach focused on addressing domestic issues 2.

Common questions

When is the election?

The general election is on November 3, 2026.

How do the candidates differ on Immigration?

Yassamin Ansari supports secure borders alongside pro-immigration policies and meaningful reform that reflects national values and supports all Arizonans. She votes nay on multiple immigration enforcement and security bills but yea on a national emergency resolution. Alan Aversa opposes expanding federal border-enforcement efforts, stating the issue should be handled at the state level first. David Redkey opposes expanding federal border enforcement, arguing it distracts from economic problems affecting the working class.

How do the candidates differ on Public Safety & Crime?

Yassamin Ansari votes in favor of prison staff safety and guard acts but against bills related to privacy, veterans' 2nd amendment rights, bail, and violent offenders. David Redkey opposes increasing federal penalties for drug and trafficking offenses, arguing that such penalties would mainly harm poor people.

How do the candidates differ on Abortion?

Alan Aversa opposes abortion, viewing it as the unjust taking of innocent life and supports pro-life efforts to end child-killing and protect the right to life for all. He also supports defending the right to life from conception onward. David Redkey supports reproductive rights, affirming that every woman has the absolute right to decide what happens to her own body free from political or governmental interference. He opposes restricting federal funding tied to abortion services, calling such restrictions a way to control women.

How do the candidates differ on Foreign Policy & Defense?

Yassamin Ansari votes yea on resolutions to remove US forces from hostilities and veterans clinic naming but nay on defense authorization and FISA extension. Alan Aversa opposes U.S. involvement and funding of wars abroad, emphasizing an America-first approach focused on addressing domestic issues.